Redesigning Credit

Access for Gen Z

A UX Case Study on Reimagining

the Freedom Rise Acquisition

Journey

Role

UX Design & Experience Strategy

Company

Chase · J.P. Morgan

Initiative

Freedom Rise

Background & Context

Problem Statement

Market Context

Gen Z represents the largest generation in

U.S. history, with significant spending power

but limited access to traditional credit

products. Traditional credit scoring models,

which rely heavily on credit history,

systematically exclude young adults who

haven't had the opportunity to build credit.

Chase recognized this as both a business

opportunity and a responsibility to serve

underbanked populations, leading to the

Freedom Rise initiative focused on financial

inclusion for young adults.

Business Challenge

Chase's existing credit approval process

was designed for customers with

established credit histories. This created a

significant barrier for Gen Z applicants,

resulting in high rejection rates and lost

business to competitors offering alternative

credit products.

The challenge was to redesign the

acquisition experience while maintaining

Chase's risk management standards and

regulatory compliance requirements.

Why This Mattered

Financial Inclusion

Providing access to credit for

underserved populations aligns with

Chase's commitment to community

development

Future Customer Base

Gen Z will become the primary banking

demographic, making early engagement

crucial for long-term growth

Competitive Advantage

Fintech companies were capturing

young customers with innovative credit

products, threatening traditional

banking

My Role and Responsibilities

I oversaw the design of the Freedom Rise

credit acquisition experience.

01

KPI and OKR Development

Established key performance indicators

and objectives

02

Research

Developed user personas based on data,

identified issues beyond the interface,

focusing on judgmental lending

03

Iterative Process

Refined the approach and conducted a

small-scale pilot

04

Analysis & Implementation

Working closely with cross-functional

teams to redesign the lending acquisition

system

"The challenge wasn't just

designing an interface, but

reimagining an entire system that

was fundamentally flawed for an

entire generation."

Stakeholder Map

Freedom Rise Initiative

DESIGN

• UX Design & Experience Strategy

• UX Research

PRODUCT

• Product Managers

• Project Managers

DATA

• Data Insights

• Data Scientist

• Risk Modelling

• Credit Analyst

TECHNOLOGY

• Engineers

• Q/A Testers

• Architecture

LEGAL & RISK

• Legal Counsel

• Compliance

• Risk Analyst

BUSINESS

• Judgmental Lending

• Manual Underwriters

• Process Analysts

• Requirements Analyst

Project Goal

The goal of the project was to

increase approval rates for Gen

Z applicants by at least 15%

by

redesigning the Freedom Rise

acquisition experience and

rethinking lending criteria to better

support first-time credit users with

limited or no credit history, without

increasing default risk.

Research

I conducted qualitative interviews with 40

Gen Z applicants who had recently been

rejected.

"I didn't even know I got rejected

until I got an email. I just assumed I

wasn't eligible."

— Gen Z applicant, 22

"I've had a job and paid my rent on

time for years. How is that not

enough?"

— Gen Z applicant, 24

Initial Hypothesis vs Reality

Initial Hypothesis

Interface issues were the main

barrier.

Reality

Interface design accounted for only

4% of problems. The root cause was

the traditional, judgmental lending

criteria.

Iteration & Implementation

Reframing Risk: The Case for Secured

Credit

Secured Credit Card

• Refundable deposit required to open an

account

• Low risk to the issuer

• Low-fee cards available for bad credit

• Credit limit is based on the amount of

the deposit

Unsecured Credit Card

• No deposit or collateral required to open

an account

• High risk to the issuer

• Low-fee cards usually require good

credit

• Credit limit is based on credit profile and

income

Pilot Test: Finding the Ideal Deposit

Amount

Objective

Determine the optimal secured

deposit amount that indicates

responsible financial behavior

without creating unnecessary

barriers for young, first-time

applicants.

Pilot Setup

Participants: 500 previously declined

applicants (ages 18-24, no credit

history)

Duration: 3 months

Deposit Amounts Tested

Group A: $100

Group B: $250

Group C: $500

Outcome

$250 deposit provided the best balance of

affordability, responsibility, and meaningful

commitment.

Deposit

Amount

Acceptance

Rate

Consistent

Payments

$100

High (92%)

Moderate

(68%)

$250

High (88%)

High (85%)

$500

Low (42%)

High (90%)

Results and Takeaways

01

Let data tell the true story

Moving beyond assumptions to

uncover the real barriers

preventing Gen Z from accessing

credit

02

Look beyond the symptoms to

find the root cause

Interface issues were only 4% of

the problem—the real issue was

systemic lending criteria

03

Restructuring the need as a

business vs. design problem

Framing the solution in business

terms helped secure stakeholder

buy-in for systemic change

Final Impact

Approval Rate Improvement

+23%

Increase in Gen Z approval rates

Exceeded the target of 15% improvement

by implementing secured credit card

option with optimal $250 deposit

Business Impact

Customer Acquisition

+35%

Competitor Migration

-28%

Payment Consistency

85%

"Sometimes the biggest

design challenge isn't what

users see—it's changing the

system they can't see."

This project taught me that true

user experience design sometimes

means stepping outside the

interface entirely. By addressing

the fundamental lending criteria

rather than just the application

flow, we created lasting change

that opened credit access to an

entire generation.

"Young applicants are being

rejected for credit, not

because of poor financial

behavior—but because of

traditional lending models."

70%

Gen Z applicants were being rejected

83%

retention rate when applicants were

approved

43%

rejected applicants went to

competitors

Redesigning Credit Access for

Gen Z

A UX Case Study on Reimagining the Freedom Rise Acquisition Journey

Role

UX Design & Experience

Strategy

Company

Chase · J.P. Morgan

Initiative

Freedom Rise

Background & Context

Problem Statement

Market Context

Gen Z represents the largest generation in

U.S. history, with significant spending power

but limited access to traditional credit

products. Traditional credit scoring models,

which rely heavily on credit history,

systematically exclude young adults who

haven't had the opportunity to build credit.

Chase recognized this as both a business

opportunity and a responsibility to serve

underbanked populations, leading to the

Freedom Rise initiative focused on financial

inclusion for young adults.

Business Challenge

Chase's existing credit approval process

was designed for customers with

established credit histories. This created a

significant barrier for Gen Z applicants,

resulting in high rejection rates and lost

business to competitors offering alternative

credit products.

The challenge was to redesign the

acquisition experience while maintaining

Chase's risk management standards and

regulatory compliance requirements.

Why This Mattered

Financial Inclusion

Providing access to credit for

underserved populations

aligns with Chase's

commitment to community

development

Future Customer Base

Gen Z will become the

primary banking

demographic, making early

engagement crucial for long-

term growth

Competitive Advantage

Fintech companies were

capturing young customers

with innovative credit

products, threatening

traditional banking

My Role and Responsibilities

I oversaw the design of the Freedom Rise credit acquisition experience.

01

KPI and OKR Development

Established key performance indicators and

objectives

02

Research

Developed user personas based on data,

identified issues beyond the interface,

focusing on judgmental lending

03

Iterative Process

Refined the approach and conducted a

small-scale pilot

04

Analysis & Implementation

Working closely with cross-functional teams

to redesign the lending acquisition system

"The challenge wasn't just

designing an interface, but

reimagining an entire system that

was fundamentally flawed for an

entire generation."

Stakeholder Map

Freedom Rise Initiative

DESIGN

• UX Design & Experience Strategy

• UX Research

PRODUCT

• Product Managers

• Project Managers

DATA

• Data Insights

• Data Scientist

• Risk Modelling

• Credit Analyst

TECHNOLOGY

• Engineers

• Q/A Testers

• Architecture

LEGAL & RISK

• Legal Counsel

• Compliance

• Risk Analyst

BUSINESS

• Judgmental Lending

• Manual Underwriters

• Process Analysts

• Requirements Analyst

Project Goal

The goal of the project was to

increase approval rates for Gen Z applicants by at

least 15%

by redesigning the Freedom Rise acquisition experience and rethinking

lending criteria to better support first-time credit users with limited or no credit

history, without increasing default risk.

Research

I conducted qualitative interviews with 40 Gen Z applicants who had recently been rejected.

"I didn't even know I got rejected until

I got an email. I just assumed I wasn't

eligible."

— Gen Z applicant, 22

"I've had a job and paid my rent on

time for years. How is that not

enough?"

— Gen Z applicant, 24

User Journey

1

Awareness

2

Research

3

Application

4

Rejection

5

Aftermath

ACTIONS

Sees bank's credit

card ad online

Visits website,

compares starter

cards

Fills out

application, adds

employment and

bank info

Gets a mailed letter

stating she's

declined

Tells herself she'll

try again later.

Doesn't revisit that

bank

EMOTIONS

Hopeful, Motivated

Curious, Cautious

Nervous, Uncertain

Embarrassed,

Confused

Defeated,

Frustrated

THOUGHTS

"Maybe now I can

start building my

credit."

"Which one can I

actually get

approved for?"

"I hope my job and

savings are

enough."

"I'm doing

everything right-

why am I not good

enough?"

"Maybe credit just

isn't for me."

PAIN POINTS

Doesn't fully

understand credit

eligibility

requirements.

No clear path for

those with no

credit history.

Form feels generic,

no indication of

likelihood of

approval.

Vague rejection

reason, long delay

in response.

Loss of trust and

brand

abandonment.

OPPORTUNITIES

Educate users on

"what makes you

creditworthy"

upfront.

Add a clear "New

to Credit?" guided

experience.

Pre-qualification or

soft check option

would reduce

anxiety.

Offer real-time or

clearer feedback

with supportive

tone.

Follow-up with

education and

alternative product

suggestions.

Initial Hypothesis vs Reality

Initial Hypothesis

Interface issues were the main barrier.

Reality

Interface design accounted for only

4% of problems. The root cause was

the traditional, judgmental lending

criteria.

What customers see: UI

A styling and data layer that is surfaced to customers

Infrastructure: Channels + Digital

Powers the engine that determines what is showcased to the user

What customers need: CX

Generates frames and journeys to close key gaps

Initial Approval Process

Initially, the approval process relied solely on credit scores, which proved ineffective due to the

lack of credit history among Gen Z individuals.

Start

Complete

Application

2,130,294

1

STRATA*

Prescreen

2,061,263

2

CREDIT BUREAU (CBR

pull)**

1,905,494

End

DECLINE

LETTERS

1,333,846

*STRATA: Strategic Risk Assessment Tool

**CBR: Credit Bureau Report

Iteration & Implementation

Reframing Risk: The Case for Secured Credit

Secured Credit Card

• Refundable deposit required to open an

account

• Low risk to the issuer

• Low-fee cards available for bad credit

• Credit limit is based on the amount of the

deposit

Unsecured Credit Card

• No deposit or collateral required to open

an account

• High risk to the issuer

• Low-fee cards usually require good credit

• Credit limit is based on credit profile and

income

Pilot Test: Finding the Ideal Deposit Amount

Objective

Determine the optimal secured deposit amount that indicates responsible financial

behavior without creating unnecessary barriers for young, first-time applicants.

Pilot Setup

Participants: 500 previously declined

applicants (ages 18-24, no credit history)

Duration: 3 months

Deposit Amounts Tested

Group A: $100

Group B: $250

Group C: $500

Outcome

$250 deposit provided the best balance of affordability, responsibility, and meaningful

commitment.

Deposit Amount

Acceptance Rate

Consistent Payments

$100

High (92%)

Moderate (68%)

$250 ✓

High (88%)

High (85%)

$500

Low (42%)

High (90%)

Results and Takeaways

01

Let data tell

the true story

Moving beyond

assumptions to

uncover the real

barriers

preventing Gen Z

from accessing

credit

02

Look beyond

the symptoms

to find the root

cause

Interface issues

were only 4% of

the problem—the

real issue was

systemic lending

criteria

03

Restructuring

the need as a

business vs.

design

problem

Framing the

solution in

business terms

helped secure

stakeholder buy-

in for systemic

change

Final Impact

Approval Rate Improvement

+23%

Increase in Gen Z approval rates

Exceeded the target of 15% improvement by

implementing secured credit card option

with optimal $250 deposit

Business Impact

Customer Acquisition

+35%

Competitor Migration

-28%

Payment Consistency

85%

"Sometimes the biggest design challenge isn't what users see—it's

changing the system they can't see."

This project taught me that true user experience design sometimes means stepping

outside the interface entirely. By addressing the fundamental lending criteria rather

than just the application flow, we created lasting change that opened credit access to

an entire generation.

"Young applicants are being rejected for credit, not because of poor financial

behavior—but because of traditional lending models."

70%

Gen Z applicants were being

rejected

83%

retention rate when

applicants were approved

43%

rejected applicants went to

competitors

Redesigning Credit Access for Gen Z

A UX Case Study on Reimagining the Freedom Rise Acquisition Journey

UX Design & Experience Strategy

Company

Chase · J.P. Morgan

Initiative

Freedom Rise

Background & Context

Problem Statement

Gen Z represents the largest generation in U.S. history, with significant spending power but limited access to traditional credit products. Traditional credit scoring models, which rely heavily on credit history, systematically exclude young adults who haven't had the opportunity to build credit.

Chase recognized this as both a business opportunity and a responsibility to serve underbanked populations, leading to the Freedom Rise initiative focused on financial inclusion for young adults.

Business Challenge

Chase's existing credit approval process was designed for customers with established credit histories. This created a significant barrier for Gen Z applicants, resulting in high rejection rates and lost business to competitors offering alternative credit products.

The challenge was to redesign the acquisition experience while maintaining Chase's risk management standards and regulatory compliance requirements.

Role

Market Context

Why This Mattered

Financial Inclusion

Providing access to credit for

underserved populations aligns

with Chase's commitment to

community development

Future Customer Base

Gen Z will become the primary

banking demographic, making early

engagement crucial for long-term

growth

Competitive Advantage

Fintech companies were capturing

young customers with innovative

credit products, threatening

traditional banking

"Young applicants are being rejected for credit, not because of poor financial behavior—but

because of traditional lending models."

70%

Gen Z applicants were being

rejected

83%

retention rate when applicants were

approved

43%

rejected applicants went to

competitors

My Role and Responsibilities

I oversaw the design of the Freedom Rise credit acquisition experience.

01

KPI and OKR Development

Established key performance indicators and

objectives

02

Research

Developed user personas based on data, identified

issues beyond the interface, focusing on judgmental

lending

03

Iterative Process

Refined the approach and conducted a small-scale

pilot

04

Analysis & Implementation

Working closely with cross-functional teams to

redesign the lending acquisition system

"The challenge wasn't just designing an interface, but reimagining an entire system that was fundamentally flawed for an entire generation."

Stakeholder Map

Freedom Rise Initiative

DESIGN

• UX Design & Experience

Strategy

• UX Research

PRODUCT

• Product Managers

• Project Managers

DATA

• Data Insights

• Data Scientist

• Risk Modelling

• Credit Analyst

TECHNOLOGY

• Engineers

• Q/A Testers

• Architecture

LEGAL & RISK

• Legal Counsel

• Compliance

• Risk Analyst

BUSINESS

• Judgmental Lending

• Manual Underwriters

• Process Analysts

• Requirements Analyst

Project Goal

The goal of the project was to increase approval rates for Gen Z applicants by at least 15% by

redesigning the Freedom Rise acquisition experience and rethinking lending criteria to better support

first-time credit users with limited or no credit history, without increasing default risk.

Research

I conducted qualitative interviews with 40 Gen Z applicants who had recently been rejected.

"I didn't even know I got rejected until I got an

email. I just assumed I wasn't eligible."

— Gen Z applicant, 22

"I've had a job and paid my rent on time for

years. How is that not enough?"

— Gen Z applicant, 24

User Journey

Awareness

Research

Application

Rejection

Aftermath

ACTIONS

Sees bank's credit card

ad online

Visits website,

compares starter cards

Fills out application,

adds employment and

bank info

Gets a mailed letter

stating she's declined

Tells herself she'll try

again later. Doesn't

revisit that bank

EMOTIONS

Hopeful, Motivated

Curious, Cautious

Nervous, Uncertain

Embarrassed,

Confused

Defeated, Frustrated

THOUGHTS

"Maybe now I can start

building my credit."

"Which one can I

actually get approved

for?"

"I hope my job and

savings are enough."

"I'm doing everything

right- why am I not

good enough?"

"Maybe credit just isn't

for me."

PAIN POINTS

Doesn't fully

understand credit

eligibility requirements.

No clear path for those

with no credit history.

Form feels generic, no

indication of likelihood

of approval.

Vague rejection reason,

long delay in response.

Loss of trust and brand

abandonment.

OPPORTUNITIES

Educate users on "what

makes you

creditworthy" upfront.

Add a clear "New to

Credit?" guided

experience.

Pre-qualification or

soft check option

would reduce anxiety.

Offer real-time or

clearer feedback with

supportive tone.

Follow-up with

education and

alternative product

suggestions.

Initial Hypothesis vs Reality

Initial Hypothesis

Interface issues were the main barrier.

Reality

Interface design accounted for only 4% of

problems. The root cause was the traditional,

judgmental lending criteria.

What customers see: UI

A styling and data layer that is surfaced to customers

Infrastructure: Channels + Digital

Powers the engine that determines what is showcased to the user

What customers need: CX

Generates frames and journeys to close key gaps

Initial Approval Process

Initially, the approval process relied solely on credit scores, which proved ineffective due to the lack of credit

history among Gen Z individuals.

Start

Complete Application

2,130,294

1

STRATA* Prescreen

2,061,263

2

CREDIT BUREAU (CBR pull)**

1,905,494

End

DECLINE LETTERS

1,333,846

*STRATA: Strategic Risk Assessment Tool

**CBR: Credit Bureau Report

Iteration & Implementation

Reframing Risk: The Case for Secured Credit

Secured Credit Card

• Refundable deposit required to open an account

• Low risk to the issuer

• Low-fee cards available for bad credit

• Credit limit is based on the amount of the deposit

Unsecured Credit Card

• No deposit or collateral required to open an account

• High risk to the issuer

• Low-fee cards usually require good credit

• Credit limit is based on credit profile and income

Pilot Test: Finding the Ideal Deposit Amount

Objective

Determine the optimal secured deposit amount that indicates responsible financial behavior without

creating unnecessary barriers for young, first-time applicants.

Pilot Setup

Participants: 500 previously declined applicants (ages

18-24, no credit history)

Duration: 3 months

Deposit Amounts Tested

Group A: $100

Group B: $250

Group C: $500

Outcome

$250 deposit provided the best balance of affordability, responsibility, and meaningful commitment.

Deposit Amount

Acceptance Rate

Consistent Payments

$100

High (92%)

Moderate (68%)

$250 ✓

High (88%)

High (85%)

$500

Low (42%)

High (90%)

Results and Takeaways

01

Let data tell the true story

Moving beyond assumptions to uncover the real barriers

preventing Gen Z from accessing credit

02

Look beyond the symptoms to find

the root cause

Interface issues were only 4% of the problem—the real issue was systemic lending criteria

03

Restructuring the need as a business vs. design problem

Framing the solution in business terms helped secure stakeholder buy- in for systemic change

Final Impact

Approval Rate Improvement

+23%

Increase in Gen Z approval rates

Exceeded the target of 15% improvement by

implementing secured credit card option with optimal

$250 deposit

Business Impact

Customer Acquisition

+35%

Competitor Migration

-28%

Payment Consistency

85%

"Sometimes the biggest design challenge isn't what users see—it's changing the

system they can't see."

This project taught me that true user experience design sometimes means stepping outside the

interface entirely. By addressing the fundamental lending criteria rather than just the application flow,

we created lasting change that opened credit access to an entire generation.